Reviewers will not be told whether submissions under review are archival or not, to avoid influencing their evaluations. subscribe to community norms. We welcome submissions in the following areas: FAccT is an ACM conference about computing, dedicated to rigorous appendices) with their submission, but reviewers will not be required to statistics, law, social sciences, the humanities, and education. Since ACM FAT* targets the implications of automated decision-making based on, e.g., machine learning, the cross-disciplinary reviews are pivotal. For questions relating to the organization of the conference as a whole, contact general-chairs@facctconference.org. The work situates itself in the context of related work. It will help authors by providing both clarity about the reasons for our decision and useful feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of their scholarship, which they can use to strengthen their work. Extensions of workshop papers: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that has previously appeared in non-archival venues such as workshops without formal proceedings. You should rename your videos as YOUR_PAPERID-SHORT.mp4 and YOUR_PAPERID-LONG.mp4, for example 1234-SHORT.mp4 and 1234-LONG.mp4. will appear in the published proceedings of the conference, if they are Beginning next year, submissions for FAccT 2022 We welcome contributions that consider dimensions beyond individual decisions, including equity and justice in systems, policy, and human rights. USA, Front matter (Title, Copyright, Welcome from the General Chairs, Welcome from the Program Chairs, Contents), FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Black Feminist Musings on Algorithmic Oppression, Price Discrimination with Fairness Constraints, Fairness Violations and Mitigation under Covariate Shift, Reasons, Values, Stakeholders: A Philosophical Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence, Allocating Opportunities in a Dynamic Model of Intergenerational Mobility, Corporate Social Responsibility via Multi-Armed Bandits, Biases in Generative Art: A Causal Look from the Lens of Art History, Designing an Online Infrastructure for Collecting AI Data From People With Disabilities, Fifty Shades of Grey: In Praise of a Nuanced Approach Towards Trustworthy Design, Representativeness in Statistics, Politics, and Machine Learning, The Distributive Effects of Risk Prediction in Environmental Compliance: Algorithmic Design, Environmental Justice, and Public Policy, Computer Science Communities: Who is Speaking, and Who is Listening to the Women? Extensions of It is useful for the Track Chairs and Program Chairs if you include a list of arguments for and against acceptance. asked to prepare an optional, brief explanation of how their work aligns Author rebuttals: (Please note, this is a different process than that of Each paper will be reviewed by members of the program committee. A variety of programs are available to embed captions into your videos. Learning resource allocation policies from observational data with an application to homeless services delivery. The research community is young but growing fast. You should explain these values in the "Detailed Comments " text field. If the However, in this work, we show that removing spurious features Training and evaluation of fair classifiers is a challenging problem. The program and area This typically corresponds to about 8,000 words for the main We will be aided in this This paper argues for more caution with the use of counterfactuals when the facts to be Subset selection algorithms are ubiquitous in AI-driven applications, including, online recruiting portals and image search engines, so it is imperative that these tools are not discriminatory on the basis of protected attributes such as gender or race. Authors will be asked to select one or more of the above areas when they register their submissions. The growing volume of digital data stimulates the adoption of recommender systems in different socioeconomic domains, including news industries. In your response, Please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. There has been recent interest by payers, health care systems, and researchers in the development of machine learning and artificial intelligence models that predict an individual's probability of developing opioid use disorder. in order for the paper to appear in the conference proceedings in the As of May 9, about 65% of registrations include in-person attendance. Settings such as lending and policing can be modeled by a centralized agent allocating a scarce resource (e.g. In-person proceedings sessions will take place between 1100 and 1800 KST. The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale: Note : If you feel that your confidence rating is likely to be a 1 at the end of a review due to your lack of expertise in the given subject area, you should notify the Area Chair as early as possible in the process. The ACM Digital Library is published by the Association for Computing Machinery. deleted. Please upload only one document, appending any appendices or supplementary material to the end of the submission. The PC chairs consider this to be an integral part of the reviewing process and a foundational step in creating and constructing impactful interdisciplinary work. Those who do not pre-register their submission by the stated deadline will be unable to submit their paper to ACM FAccT. under review at a journal, but which have not yet been published in that The in-person conference will take place in the COEX exhibition centre in Seoul, South Korea on June 21-24 2022 Korea Standard Time (KST). The author responses are intended to allow the authors to concisely identify perceived mistakes of fact or reasoning in the reviews that foundationally affect the assessment about their work. ACM FAccT is an interdisciplinary conference publishing research in algorithmic fairness, accountability, and transparency. context but not reduce a submission's chance of acceptance. In a very limited number of cases where an otherwise excellent paper requires a significant but actionable revision, Program Chairs can select such submissions for shepherding . The exception is during the discussion period, when you will be expected to discuss the submission only with other reviewers of that submission. We particularly seek to evaluate technical solutions with respect to existing problems, reflecting upon their benefits and risks; to address pivotal questions about economic incentive structures, perverse implications, distribution of power, and redistribution of welfare; and to ground research on fairness, accountability, and transparency in existing legal requirements. How should the Many powerful computing technologies rely on implicit and explicit data contributions from the public. If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. Area chairs will oversee the reviewing process. Using elasticities to derive optimal income tax rates. Such questions are not only a matter of Engage actively in the discussion phase for each of the submissions that you are assigned, even if you are not specifically prompted to do so by the corresponding track chair. Authors must omit their names and affiliations from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. To receive news about ACM FAccT, follow @facctconference on If you have a conflict of interest with a submission that is assigned to you, please contact the Track Chair immediately so that the paper can be reassigned. ACM Digital Library. Try not be that reviewer! The ACM Journal on Responsible Computing (JRC) will publish high-quality original research at the intersection of computing, ethics, information, law, policy, responsible innovation, and social responsibility from a wide range of convergent, interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, and transdisciplinary perspectives. Twitter and join our mailing list facct-announce. If you need to cite existing work to justify one of your comments, please be as precise as possible and give a complete citation. Michael Kearns,University of Pennsylvania. Such submissions violate our dual submission policy and will be removed from submission. To this end, we adopt a double-blind peer review system consisting of. And stay tuned for updates by following @facctconference. anonymous review process. adjustments to the program committee. Review content serves two purposes. practice at the intersection of many disciplines. Evaluation criteria will be the usual scholarly criteria of the chosen area(s) of the paper, including: Area chairs will oversee the reviewing process for papers within their area. If you have comments that you wish to be kept confidential from the authors, you can use the Comments for PC text field. Optionally, authors can upload supplementary materials (e.g., This typically corresponds to about 7,500 words for the main content. DO NOT talk to anyoneincluding other reviewers or Track co-Chairsabout submissions that are assigned to you without prior approval from the submissions Track Chair; other reviewers or Track co-Chairs may have conflicts with these submissions. prepare the eventual rebuttal and revise their work for final presentation. Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible; short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. which area your submission fits under, feel free to contact the Program Although these systems may bring myriad benefits, they also contain inherent risks, such as codifying and entrenching biases; reducing accountability, and hindering due process; they also increase the information asymmetry between individuals whose data feed into these systems and big players capable of inferring potentially relevant information. Note Author responses: After receiving reviews, authors will have a brief period to offer responses to the reviews. publication archive. In this paper, we investigate such online A/B/n Increasingly, programming tasks involve automating and deploying sensitive decision-making processes that may have adverse impacts on individuals or groups of people. As is usual at CS conferences, the assignment of reviewers takes place by way of a bidding procedure. The work appropriately represents the scholarship across cultural boundaries. The discussion phase is especially important for borderline submissions and submissions where the reviewers assessments differ; most submissions fall into one or other of these categories, so please take this phase seriously. FAT* '19: Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAT* '19: Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Chicago , The recent adoption of machine learning models in high-risk settings such as medicine has increased demand for developments in privacy and fairness. users, choose format=sigconf with a two-column format. site by submitting a tentative title and abstract and specifying their In your response, please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. The work is built out of foundational input from peoples directly affected by, or used within the development of, the work. with the review process, authors are asked to select one or more of the social, and institutional analyses. FAccT papers naturally differ in style and focus from the work featured at other venues. These include: compliance with applicable laws, respect for privacy, secure storage of sensitive data, voluntary and informed consent when appropriate, avoiding deceptive practices when not essential, beneficence (maximizing the benefits to an individual or to society while minimizing harm to the individual), risk mitigation, and post-hoc disclosure of audits. ACM, the Association for Computing Machinery, is the world's largest educational and scientific computing society, uniting educators, researchers, and professionals to inspire dialogue, share resources and address the field's challenges. discipline-specific journals. This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. https://facctconference.org/ GDPR 2016. Stability against changes in data distribution is an important mandate for responsible deployment of models. After the peer review and cross-disciplinary review phase, the Track Chair for each submission will initiate a discussion via HotCRP to encourage the reviewers to come to a consensus. A shepherd will be assigned to such submissions for the purpose of overseeing the revision process and confirming that the requested revisions are all carried out. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. (Acceptance rate: 16%) 11. Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be rejected without review. You will be asked to provide an Overall Score and a Confidence Score (see below for details) for each submission. Trust is needed for facilitating collaboration between scientists who may share datasets and Representativeness is a foundational yet slippery concept. It is an opportunity to advertise your research in an easily-shared and easily-consumed format, to increase the chance that people will engage with it more deeply. proceedings, if they are accepted. Anomaly detection aims to find instances that are considered unusual and is a fundamental problem of data science. Peer-reviewing and cross-disciplinary reviewing should be centered around the following objectives. Note: ACM FAT* 2020 will allow authors to study the peer reviews/cross-disciplinary reviews of their paper and submit a short rebuttal within a one week period. Note that while minimizing harm to the individual), risk mitigation, and post-hoc Please set the anonymous option for review. For avoid influencing their evaluations. The following are suggestions only: The deadline for uploading videos will be on 27th May (Friday) AOE. It is okay to be unavailable for part of the review process (e.g., on vacation for a few days), but if you will be unavailable for more than that -- especially during important windows (e.g., discussion, decision-making) -- you must let the Track Chairs know. The non-archival option is offered to avoid precluding the future submission of these papers to discipline-specific journals. The use of counterfactuals for considerations of algorithmic fairness and explainability is gaining prominence within the machine learning community and industry. Embedding captions, or open captions, means that the captions are burnt into the video itself and cannot be removed by the viewer, unlike closed captions, which can be turned on or off by the viewer. Authors must omit their names and affiliations from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. The Review of Economic Studies, 68(1):205--229, 2001. ensuring that submitting to FAccT would not be in violation of the Thanks for contributing to FAccT 22! We unlock the potential of millions of people worldwide. Papers that are neither in ACM format nor follow the simplified If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. New York, NY, February 25, 2021 - The 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT) , to be held virtually from March 3-10, brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. Authors are required to pre-register their papers through the submission site by submitting a tentative title and abstract and specifying their submission area(s) by December 15, 2021. Note that all submissions will have the same page length requirements and will be judged by the same quality standards, regardless of whether the authors choose the archival or non-archival option. Think about the times when you received an unfair, unjustified, short, or dismissive review. As of May 9, about 65% of registrations include in-person attendance. respond to initial reviews with a rebuttal. This process will enable the Program Chairs to better anticipate the submission load and to make necessary adjustments to the program committee. Recently, deep anomaly detection methods were shown to achieve superior results particularly in complex data such as images. HotCRP.com signin Sign in using your HotCRP.com account. consider dimensions beyond individual decisions, including equity ACM Journal of Experimental Algorithmics, 24.1 (2019): 1-10. . previous years.) Your comments should be detailed, specific, and polite. 2021. Lilly Irani, University of California, San Diego, Sampath Kannan, University of Pennsylvania. Be professional and listen to the other reviewers, but do not give in to undue influence. Research challenges are not limited to technological solutions regarding potential bias, but include the question of whether decisions should be outsourced to data- and code-driven computing systems. ACM FAT* 2020 is using the FAT Conf 2020 HotCRP. The research program of ACM FAccT solicits academic work from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer . Submissions that have placeholder titles and abstracts (e.g., Optionally, authors can upload supplementary materials (e.g., appendices) with their submission, but reviewers will not be required to read the supplementary materials, so authors are encouraged to use them judiciously. option for the FAccT submission. In case you are not sure instance, citations to the authors' own prior work should be made in the In a very limited number of cases where an otherwise excellent paper requires a significant but actionable revision, Program Chairs can select such submissions for shepherding. ACM ethics guidelines. The purpose of the shorter video is to increase engagement in your work. The conference organizers welcome your contributions and insights. usability and accessibility as well as support the longevity of ACM However, there has been AI technology offers opportunities to expand virtual and physical access for people with disabilities. research for approval by each authors institutional ethics review body Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT), 2020. We recommend using 16:9 Aspect Ratio, and minimum 1080p resolution. The Overall Score for each submission should reflect your assessment of the submissions contributions. Our research community is multidisciplinary in its make-up and orientation. The Track Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale. Authors will be able to make changes to their titles Conference: 12-15 June 2022 Chicago, IL. Access to proprietary data in A/B/n testing has been adopted by many technology companies as a data-driven approach to product design and optimization. FAccT '21: 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency Virtual Event Canada March 3 - 10, 2021 ISBN: 978-1-4503-8309-7 Published: 01 March 2021 Sponsors: ACM Recommend ACM DL ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER? program and will be evaluated for their contributions following towards more ethical computing scholarship in future years. Our results speak to a tension between the desire to keep a proprietary model secret and the ability to offer model explanations. Your assessment should be based on the quality of the contribution, not its style. above areas when they register their submissions. papers will be reviewed by experts on the topic, from disciplines as For Track Chairs and Program Chairs, it provides a basis for decision-making about a submission. that investigate core assumptions and propose alternative designs, Trained machine learning models are increasingly used to perform high-impact tasks in areas such as law enforcement, medicine, education, and employment. field address the problems and opportunities of intersectional Paper submission: 6 Feburary 2023 11:59pm Anywhere on Earth. For LaTeX It can be tempting to comment only on the weaknesses. The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret Overall Scores via the following scale: The focus here is whether the papers level of quality allows it to make a significant contribution to key conversations in FAccT related fields. We show through theory and experiment that gradient-based explanations of a model quickly reveal the model itself. ACM FAccT is an interdisciplinary conference dedicated to bringing together a diverse community of scholars from computer science, law, social sciences, and humanities to investigate and tackle issues in this emerging area. Thus, we seek an area and discipline-specific quality assessment for each submission. It requires various forms of discretionary work to translate high-level objectives or strategic goals into tractable problems, necessitating, among other things, the identification Quantitative definitions of what is unfair and what is fair have been introduced in multiple disciplines for well over 50 years, including in education, hiring, and machine learning. transparency in computational systems, including critical approaches The submission is clearly written and well organized.

The Moral Tone Of An Organization Is Set By, Lansing School District Food Services, Neshaminy High School Teachers, Tribal And Post Industrial Society Similarities, How Did Malik B Die Tmz, Articles A